|
|
MR. PIRROMOUNT IN PRODUCTION PAST PRODUCTIONS REVIEWS & ARTICLES LICENSING SHOP PIRROMOUNT ASK MR. PIRRO FAN MAIL LINKS |
UPDATED PIRROMOUNT NEWS
INDIES, APPRECIATE THE FREEDOM
When I made my first
short film, in 1970, I didn't give much thought
to its commercial value. I was 14, I had a
super 8 movie camera, and I wanted to tell a
story. I created a crude little film
called, "Death of a Vampire." It starred a
handful of classmates and neighborhood kids, ran
about 10 minutes, and was very primitive in
appearance and technique. It took a little
monetary investment - about $75, and a bit of
time, about three months, to produce.
Mark Pirro in his first super 8 short "Death of a
Vampire" (1971) My next film, Screen of Fate, was a bit more ambitious. It dealt with a scientist, who invented a machine that could show him the future. Looking into it, he sees his own murder, which as the 10 minute feature eventually reveals, he brings on himself with his knowledge of the future. This was followed by my Super hero project, Batman Jr.
I went on to make three
more short films in upstate New York, then moved
to sunny California and went on to make two more
shorts, Buns
(1978) and The
Spy Who Did id Better" (1979).
It wouldn't be until
1981 that I would start what many have come to
believe is my defining movie and first feature
length film, "A
Polish Vampire in Burbank" (1983).
All my early films were cheap to make, but
nowhere near the low cost films can be made for
today. I mean, even though there wasn't a
lot of money spent back then (Buns -$300, Spy -
$1,600, Polish Vampire $2500), there was still
the cost of raw film stock and processing, not
to mention splicing tape. I never dreamed, all
those years ago, that there would come a time
when filmmaking would be cheaper and easier than
it was then. As many of you know, my last
two films, "Rectuma"
and "The
God Complex,"combined, cost less than the
cost of Polish Vampire, produced almost 30 years
ago. I also never dreamed that there would
be so many filmmakers on the playing field as
there are today. When I was shooting my
little super 8 projects, there were a few
hundred filmmakers out there doing the same
thing. There may have been more, but just
didn't get their work publicized. Today,
that number is in the tens of thousands.
This is encouraging and discouraging all at the
same time. The encouraging part is that
there are so many more filmmakers out there to
exhibit their talents, whereas years ago
wouldn't have attempted to make a movie.
The discouraging side of it is that, and I know
I've said this many times before, there is so
much product and content out there that breaking
ahead of the pack is like trying to find an
almond in a mountain of peanuts. This is
probably why so many filmmakers limit their
projects to Youtube video shorts and
clips. If you have a burning
story within you and you toyed with the concept
of making your own film, I can't think of a
reason why you shouldn't. We indies have an
advantage over major studio pictures: we can
afford to experiment. I doubt any studio
would have greenlit a picture about a giant
mutant ass or a guy who turns queer when the
moon rises (although they may be steering in
that direction). You're not going to find
the same lot of imagination and creativity in
mainstream movies as you will find in the indie
circuit. I've been lucky with my
films, I've managed to turn a profit with pretty
much every one. That's not as impressive
as it sounds. Remember, if a movie costs
$1000 to make, then if it grosses $2000, it's
made a 100% profit, which I can safely say all
my films have done (some have even gone on to
quadruple their budget or more). And let's
not forget the merchandising (the
Submissive Jesus Prayer Answering Talking Head).
Needless to say, one can make a fairly decent
living with a little creativity in today's
world. Of course, there's a
downside to that too. Unless your film
breaks through the sea of numerous other indie
films out there trying to get attention, it
won't be the big blockbuster we all dream of
producing, and it won't have the big financial
returns of a Martin Scorscese picture. But
if you ask me, I find it more rewarding to be
able to make exactly the movie you want to make
without a committee telling you how to do it
because they're afraid something won't play in
Peoria. Your only censorship is the
limitations of your fear. You don't have
to be concerned with keeping your film to a
PG-13 because your studio doesn't want you to
lose that all important 12-17 year old audience. I have a few friends who
have a desire to tell stories via cinema and
some of them have actually taken it upon
themselves to go ahead and do it, despite the
challenges that came with working with no
budget and numerous restraints. What drives
them? A passion that you won't find
anywhere else. It's like being a drug
addict. The drug addict needs the fix, no
matter how he gets it. A passionate
filmmaker needs to express himself via his
films, and even when many of them know that they
will not see a profit, they continue.
That's what real filmmaking is all about. The hard facts are that good stories are rarely mass produced in a factory. They come from inside a person’s soul located somewhere in the vast memory banks where their life experiences are stored. The big movie studios would love to harvest these stories on a corporate level, but the problem is you never know when a good story will come to life inside a person and take on a life of its own. And so they continue to produce movies that have more style than substance, for that is something that can be controlled. However, even with the
impressive advances in film production quality,
people generally would much rather see a good
movie with a low film production value than they
would a bad movie with a high film production
value. Of course, movies like Transformers and
any of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies might
appear to prove me wrong. Studios have to
test market their films. If they're going
to spend 100 million plus on a single movie,
they have to be sure that it is a hit. It
doesn't matter what the thinking public wants,
it's what will generate the most money.
Case in point: look at the monkey they have cast
as James Bond. That would have never flown
in the old days. Research groups told the
producers that they needed a Bourne Identity
clone and that's what they did. Movie
making by committee. Talent and a good storyline are generally worth more to movie audiences than an expensive look. If you can just get a good story made into a low budget independent film, then people may take notice. If a buzz is created about your movie, it can lead to a distribution deal that is worth many times more than the money you invested.
STILL WRITING ![]() I'm sorry to report that the website, Megaupload.com, where I parked my uncensored version of South Park's episode 201, got shut down by the feds. It was the only site that I found where I could post this uncensored episode (even South Park's own website can't post it, and the Season 14 DVD has it censored). I'll try to find another website where I can post this again, for those of you who abhor censorship, especially out of fear. I'll keep you posted. OLD
NEWS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Boxed sets of four Pirromount films now selling exclusively on Ebay. Here's your chance to get four of our classics; two vintage and two recent. ![]() In the future, I may package my
four remaining movies; Nudist Colony of
the Dead, Color-Blinded, Deathrow Gameshow
and Buford's Beach Bunnies. We'll
see. Since I don't officially hold
the rights to Deathrow Gameshow and
Buford's Beach Bunnies, that boxed set may
be a little more difficult to put
out. Stay tuned.
INTERNET BLOG INTERVIEW |